Big Brother Watch was proud to host Damian Green's speech on the fringe at the Conservative Party's Conference in Birmingham this week. Here's the text.
"British freedoms for British People"
Thank you for that introduction. It painted a bleak picture of the authoritarian state built up under thirteen years of Labour rule.
What struck me after my own arrest, and my successful campaign to have my DNA taken off the database after I was cleared, was the anger in the letters that came in from those in a similar position. Former army officers, magistrates, grandmothers in small towns who had never dreamed of offending, were all united in their distrust of the police and the authorities more generally. These are the people we have always thought of as the backbone of respectable society. Alienating them from the law enforcement authorities would be a disaster. This is one of the quiet ways that New Labour lost Middle Britain.
And even Labour’s new leader seems to agree. Ed Miliband claimed in his Conference speech last week that he wants to ‘reclaim’ liberty for the Labour Party. He has admitted that:
“I've said throughout this campaign that I believe New Labour was at times too casual about the liberty of individuals.[..] We made mistakes over ID cards and 42-day detention and how we handled stop and search powers. ”
Words are cheap. Will we see action from Ed Miliband?
Civil liberties used to be a minority interest, largely associated with the left of the political spectrum. It is a sign of how the world has turned that an organisation like Big Brother Watch has been created, and that a new centre-right Coalition Government has made one of its early priorities the restoration of civil liberties we used to take for granted. And it is not just the Liberal Democrats that care about freedom and privacy – as Conservatives we do as well.
Immediate action
Labour had a history of reaching for a database to solve a problem. These databases were presented as being for the convenience of the citizen, when the overwhelming driver is the convenience of the state. It wanted as much information as it could assemble on databases. Worse, it wanted the right to use that information as it saw fit, without any agreement from the citizen affected.
And so the new Coalition Government is taking immediate action to dismantle the database state, and start to restore traditional British freedoms. The Coalition Agreement between the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats states that “We share a conviction that the days of big government are over; that centralisation and top-down control have proved a failure…In short, it is our ambition to distribute power and opportunity to people rather than hoarding authority within government” .
The Identity Documents Bill marks a significant turning point. It is a clear symbol of the move away from the ideology underpinning Labour’s overreaching state control – that government knows best .
But it hasn’t been an easy journey. In 2004 I rebelled against a three line whip for the first time to vote against Identity Cards. The Conservative Party itself wasn’t on the right side of the argument then. And when we started campaigning in 2006, as the Shadow Home Affairs Team, against Labour’s ID cards plan, polling showed that the public was against us – they had accepted Labour’s argument that this was a necessary law and order measure. It took political leadership to turn that around. However whilst the campaign may have been based on ideology the arguments we made that gradually brought voters round to our point of view were practical – the scheme’s inefficiency and cost to the taxpayer. The Labour Party responded by constantly changing its explanation for the need for ID cards – from terrorism; to illegal immigration; to identity fraud, and finally under their fourth Home Secretary in as many years, that it would be practical.
Those in this room know that the real threat was both the cards themselves, but the National Identity Register behind the whole scheme. This would have meant that even those who applied for a passport would have had to sign up to compulsory systems which backed by biometric information, fingerprints or eye scans. The National Identity Register held almost 50 pieces of personal information. It was a Conservative manifesto commitment to scrap the National Identity Card Scheme, and the first Bill we brought before the House of Commons.
There is still a lot to be done. In Opposition we also tried to make the case against other intrusive measures, in particular the DNA database. It is unacceptable that the DNA of innocent people, not arrested for any serious charge, should be retained indefinitely on the National DNA database.
We need to break down the surveillance society. Britain leads the world in the use of CCTV, with one estimate suggesting there are up to four million cameras in the UK . Almost sixty thousand of these are controlled by local authorities, which equates to 1 council-owned CCTV camera for every 1000 people in the country. Walking down the street in England a person can be captured on CCTV up to three hundred times in one day . And whilst there is one surveillance camera for every 14 people in the UK, some studies suggest that between 60% and 80% of the images they produce are judged inadmissible in court due to their poor quality. This autumn’s Freedom Bill will contain our proposals to reform the DNA database and the regulation of CCTV.
Another controversial measure is stop and search. There were over a million stop and searches of people in 2007-08, with the Metropolitan Police accounting for more than forty percent of all stop and searches recorded in England and Wales . Some of these were under section 44 for terrorism purposes, which the then Government’s own Independent Reviewer of Terrorism criticized for being used inappropriately, saying that “examples of poor or unnecessary use of section 44 abound” . And so the Home Secretary has already announced a review of all terrorism powers to ensure we focus them once again on the purpose they were intended for. We must end mission creep.
These are policies the Home Office are working on. Many of our colleagues across the Government are equally committed to reversing Labour’s authoritarian measures – Eric Pickles has announced changes to local authority powers to spy on their citizens, such as RIPA. Phillip Hammond has cut funding for unnecessary speed cameras. And Tim Loughton is examining why our children are on so many Government databases. The largest of those started by Labour, ContactPoint, was set up under the Children Act 2004 and was designed to hold basic information on all children under 18 in England. As of last March there were 12.4 million records on ContactPoint with a further 445,000 records in the archive . The Coalition Government has already announced plans to scrap this database.
It will be slow but we have started, piece by piece, to disassemble the database state.
Future battles
And there will be future battles. We do face a very real threat of terrorism, from extremists of different types. The police are sceptical about having powers removed from them. The Labour Party is determined to outflank us on the right on crime. Alan Johnson suggests Labour hasn’t learned. This is a genuine pity. We will see victory when we finally get all political parties to accept the importance of protecting our civil liberties.
One contemporary issue that looks likely to become a battleground is about our response to measures brought in by Holland and France to ban woman from wearing the burka. There is a genuine difference of opinion across the Party and Parliament on this.
I understand that many people feel uneasy about the Islamic full veil. There are clearly times when people need to be able to identify themselves and show their face, such as at airport security or when their identity is in question. It’s not an unreasonable for MPs to ask that those attending their surgeries remove their veils for face to face meetings, although Muslim women are of course perfectly entitled to say no. What would not be sensible would be for us to get into instructing or prescribing how people should dress in their everyday lives. It is a fundamental aspect of our British values that we should be able to be different without being separate.
It is true that this can be seen as a microcosm of arguments about integration. The Labour Government’s relativist, multicultural approach led in many cases to informal segregation and suspicion between some communities. But integration of Muslims, and different Muslim communities, is a long-term goal, requiring leadership from within communities. We need to construct a single nation unified by the British traditions of tolerance, liberty, democracy and enterprise, where all can prosper.
But this cannot be achieved by top-down diktat. Even if it could, the Conservative Party believes that an arbitrary ban on what British citizens choose to wear in the street would represent an attack on British traditions. The rights of freedom of speech and freedom of worship are key rights in this country that we should rigorously uphold. It would be wrong for the Government to tell people what they can and can’t wear at all times. Under this Coalition Government, there will be no burka ban in Britain.
Poor people need civil liberties too
I chose the broad title of my speech today-‘British freedoms for British people’ - as I wanted to remind us, the modern Conservative Party, why we need to care about civil liberties.
As a One Nation Conservative, I believe we have a duty to help those who need help, and that such help is the mark of a civilised society. Therefore while we start to reform our society, rolling back the state and enhancing individual liberties, we must ensure that this group of the most disadvantaged also see the benefits. An essential part of the help we need to give the disadvantaged is the personal space and ability to control their own lives and freedom from the dictates of a nannying state that add up to what we call “civil liberties.” This is counter-intuitive for those who believe that civil liberties are an effete middle-class obsession (see any of David Blunkett’s tabloid columns). In fact the most likely victims of the surveillance state are the respectable poor, who will have been spied on throughout their daily lives, and who are not held fit to bring up their own children.
That there needs to be an alternative to Labour’s top-down approach in order to help the most disadvantaged in our society is clear. After years of more and more centralised control, ever more intrusive policing and increased public spending, the result is an underclass dependent on the state yet distanced from their communities. The policy that has been practised in recent years is failing, resulting in today’s Broken Society. One reason for this is that the so-called tough and intrusive measures that the last Government introduced often disproportionably affected lower socio-economic groups.
We have been failing the poor even in the terms preferred by the authoritarians: those who argue that the only freedom that matters is a safer street and neighbourhood. We have not made the poorer neighbourhoods safer, however much we have intruded in the lives of their inhabitants. You cannot run a modern democratic country in which your civil liberties depend on where you live, what you earn, and where your children go to school. Civil liberties are the liberties of every citizen from the richest to the poorest. We should defend and enhance them, for everyone. Civil liberties are essential for the most disadvantaged on the proposition that they should not be treated differently from the comfortable and affluent.
David Cameron has said that “where Labour think that an individual’s identity consists in being recognised, registered and assisted by the state, Conservatives think that identity is derived though membership in society. Labour thinks that social justice means equality, achieved and guaranteed by government. We think it means community, built and maintained by people themselves.”
The ultimate aim is to enable individuals to take as much control over their own lives as possible. One the biggest threats to this is an all-encompassing state; a controlling state. Ostensibly good intentions from the state to provide more security, better public services and secure personal identity are significant attacks on our privacy, liberty and choice. Instead, we need to have the courage to set people free.
This is what I mean by British freedoms being at the heart of Conservatism.
With thanks to Damian Green for permission to reproduce the speech here. We have a footnoted version of this speech to anyone who would like it via e-mail.
Big Brother Watch thanks The Freedom Association for hosting us for this and our other events at conference.
Thankfully you do seem to have been sticking to your brief lately and not running any obvious TPA/Daily Mail type stories. However your attempts to link your Tory values (BBW not the Tory speaker at your meeting) of "rolling back the state" and rampant individualism with always being good for civil liberties and any form of collectivism as always being bad for civil liberties is not one that stands any form of scrutiny.
Posted by: satipera | 08/10/2010 at 11:53 AM
Welcome back Satipera! We've missed you!
Posted by: Alex Deane | 08/10/2010 at 01:29 PM
THIS UN-DEMOCRATIC BRITAIN
Did your member of parliament live in the constituency for many years before being elected? Or, like most others, were they posted in from far flung places in the UK to stand for parliament over and above anyone in the constituency with long lineage who could stand instead?
The method of selection of candidates by the main political parties in this country is lacking in democracy at the very least. We need a different method of selecting candidates to stand in an election, one where the prospective candidate has lived in the constituency for a minimum of ten years, and has a lineage in this country going back to at least their grandparents, before they are eligible for an office such as local council or parliament.
The local political parties should not be able to nominate anyone this is where the corruption starts. A local constituents would sign up at the town hall to stand in their constituency and they can align with a political party. Many other constituents may do the same.
They would give a speech at the town hall stating their aims and why they are the best candidate for the job as m.p for the area.
On polling day one candidate will be the winner - at least they will be a local constituent not like we have at the moment all millionaires in the parliament playing at politics and never done a job of work in their lives.
Their money gets them into the local party, their donations get them nominated for parliament - totally un-democratic.
The constitution has got to be changed to not let this happen ever again.
Rant on:- http://www.rantonuk.org
Posted by: tony dean | 09/10/2010 at 07:37 PM
The raid on parliament and Damian Green`s offices can be understood in the abridged version of a book I hope to publish. It is likely to be called Thatchers Trojan Horse.
BRITAINS SECRET DEATH SQUADS
In 2009 President Obama put Leon Paneta in charge of the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY(CIA). Panetta eventually found out that the CIA was running secret assassination squads in, ‘friendly countries’, to the USA. These squads were run by Dick Cheeney. They have been kept secret from Congress. Cheeney insists they have been thought of only since 9/11 but were never made operational. Many in Congress do not believe him and are calling for proper investigations to be undertaken. Anyway I’m not holding my breath, Below is Britain’s part of that programme
On November 27 2008, Bob Quick, Metropolitan Police Assistant Commissioner in charge of specialist operations and counter-terrorism, raided the English parliament. Quick raided Damian Green MP`s office in parliament, his constituency office and his home address. It`s the first time parliament has been raided by state forces in about 400 years. Damian Green MP had all his computers confiscated. He had been leaking information to the media regards government and Home Office cover up’s. Damian Green had a civil servant in the Treasury Department of the Home Office who was acting as a mole.
The present commissioner for UK police is sir Paul Stephenson, he authorized the raid on parliament, at first Stephenson didn’t want to raid parliament but Quick assured him it was the only way, ‘to do it’ so Stephenson gave Quick the green light. Damien Green MP was arrested and his computers were searched.
I know what they were looking for; they were looking for any evidence relating to the programme that was piloted in Lancashire. Sir Paul Stephenson was Superintendent of Lancashire Constabulary at that time. He was said to have been in charge of a squad that was set up to look into the root causes of crime.
On March 14th 1991 an article appeared in the Citizen newspaper, a free paper distributed in Lancashire. The article was a police press release and its contents were as follows:
END OF THE CRIME LINE Three thousand five hundred volunteer drivers have targeted Lancashire over the last two years, it’s been a pilot scheme, first of it’s kind ever, funded by the Home Office and run in conjunction with the police. The criminal fraternity know all about who we are, we’ve hit every one of our targets and we’ve been so successful that we are now to move nation wide, other bodies will take over where we leave off.
The above operation was the forerunner to the National Criminal Intelligence Service, (NCIS). Jack Straw, the Home secretary, placed them on a statutory basis in 1998 after the Labour Party won the 1997 general election,
That article has disappeared from all libraries in Lancashire, see EXHIBIT
The Citizen newspaper archives relating to above article have also disappeared, EXHIBIT.
The Editor of the Citizen, at my request, made repeated requests to Lancashire police to provide a copy of the above police press release but eventually was told by the police to “back off”.
On March 14 1991, same date as above article published, a leaflet was put through letterboxes over a large swathe of Preston by an organization calling itself the,’Third Position’. EXHIBIT A councilor held a meeting in Preston Town Hall to bring this to the attention of other councilors.
Throughout that two-year period I was constantly stalked and terrorized by the above, they operated in “rat packs” and were using “high frequency”weapons on myself and family, EXHIBIT. For information on these weapons check out the following web sites: Paul Baird. Psychotronic or microwave weapons, Tim Rifat, microwave weapons used in the UK,Dr less Dove ,Cheril Wealch, citizens against microwave weapons, Elonar White, John Finch and there are many more. A good one is AMERICAS SECRET POLICE.
POLICE ENLIST ARMY OF SPOTTERS, that article mentions 700 spotters sponsored by BNFL, BAe systems and group 4 Total Securities, these are the other bodies that have taken over from the earlier two-year pilot scheme EXHIBIT .
This “third position,” stands for neither capitalism nor communism, but a “Third Position.” This organization is from Italy and it’s roots go back to Mussolini, it was responsible for the Bologna train bombing in 1980, 85 people lost their lives. Up until this point the Italian authorities thought they were just a bunch of patriots. After Bologna they were deemed to be a nazi death squad. The Italian authorities started to track these murderers but a lot of them managed to escape Italy, and found safe haven amongst fascists in London, England.
It is also called “Forza Nuova,” see BID TO OUTLAW FACHISTS SPARKS DIPLOMATIC ROW. This article is about a row in the Italian parliament in 2003 where calls were made to cut off diplomatic relations with Britain. The calls came when it was discovered that the nazi murder squad that fled Italy were working with the secret intelligence services of Great Britain. EXHIBIT
Nicholas Griffin, head of the BNP (British National Party) was in charge of the International Third Position with Roberto Fiore in the mid 1980’s (Fiore found safe haven in London UK, after fleeing Italy).
I sent the following information to Jacquie Smith, the then Home Secretary, about two weeks before Bob Quick flashed a so called top secret document to the press outside the British Prime Ministers home, 10 Downing St, and resigned the following day.
My MP has seen the following. John Hutton. I went to see him after I had been terrorized out of Preston, Lancashire, and had fled back to Cumbria with my family. At my request, John Hutton wrote to the Chief Constable of Lancashire police, Mrs Claire, on the 7th October 1997. He asked for details of the organization piloted by the police in Lancashire to which all the records have vanished. The reply was dated 10th October 1997 and A D Dolphin, Inspector, signed it. It stated: Unfortunately, neither I nor my colleagues can recollect a scheme as described by your constituent.
I had recited the wording of the police press release to John Hutton and shown him documentation from Lancashire`s head Librarian which stated that records had gone missing from the archives of all Lancashire’s` Libraries.
I went back to see Mr Hutton and told him that, they can’t recollect isn’t good enough, he shrugged his shoulders. My partner phoned John Hutton’s office to make me an appointment after this but was told I wasn’t having one by his research assistant, who was also aware of my plight.
I sent it to Michael Howard when he was the leader of the Conservative Party in 2004, his reply was that strict parliamentary rules stopped him from being able to help me personally but the wider issues I raised concerned him and that he would be forwarding this information to the Conservative Party Policy Making group.
I also sent this to Clair Short MP, her reply was that John Hutton MP would have to deal with it and that she had forwarded the information to him. Again John Hutton MP who is my MP will do nothing.
This has also been sent to Kevin McNamara MP. I asked him to make sure this gets to Commander David Armond who is acting on behalf of the Metropolitan Police Commissioner regarding investigation into intelligence services in relation to the Lady Diana inquiry?
In the summer of 1991, I watched a World in Action documentary; it was about the Italian Gladios. The head of the Gladio`s was being interviewed. The Gladios were discovered because someone found documentation relating to them. The head Gladio was asked, ‘who and what was your organization in Italy’, the reply was, ‘ we were set up secretly, by the Italian Government, to stave of Russian KGB infiltration but in reality we didn’t do that, instead we targeted our own people. No one knew of our existence, not even the police; three police officers became aware of our organization so we lured them to what they thought were stolen cars, we then detonated remote controlled bombs placed inside those supposedly stolen cars and killed them. We targeted anyone who spoke out against the far right, we murdered them, no one ever got caught.’
Interviewer then said ‘you scum bags, I can understand atrocities being committed when one nation is at war with another but, to do that to your own people, you scum.’
Head Gladio replied, ‘don’t you call us scum bags, I’ll tell you something, we send our gladios to your country, Great Britain, to get them trained, its so big and highly organized in your country that’s why we send them, to get them trained, then they return to Italy to carry out that training.’
Interviewer asks, ‘where are they being trained in GB’.
Gladio boss says, ‘ Im not telling you, that’s a matter for you and your people, all I’ll say is that the Free
Masons and the extreme right are at the back of it’.
October 2nd 1992, front page of Lancashire Eve post carried the story, Hidden Terror of Race Abuse Revealed EXHIBIT . An Asian taxi driver told me in early 1988 that race relations in Preston were very good, so the affect of the above was to turn Preston from a town that was tolerant of different races and cultures, into a nazi hell hole.
I have asked numerous solicitors for help, none will. I have even contacted a law firm named Matrix, Cherie Blair’s firm, wife of Tony Blair, the reply I got was that it’s not their problem.
Cherie Blair has since been in front of a government Select Committee looking spooked, telling them that she is terrified of letting her kids out because of the amount of murders happening on the streets of Britain.
The National Criminal Intelligence Service has been discontinued because it never caught any serious criminals. It has been replaced by the Serious and organized Crime Agency, (SOCA). Two former employees have appeared on a Brtish national news programme, Channel 4, saying that SOCA gets hundreds of calls from other agencies regarding serious crime, and that they ignore the intelligence they are supplied with.
Daily Star, 24 January 2010 has a story, ON THE RUN MAFIA UK. Terror gang fears over fugitives who fled Italy:
The five-all members of the infamous Camorra mob-have escaped detection despite a tip-off from a super grass that they were in Lancashire in the UK.
Detectives believe they are forming a new clan.
They have been blamed for 4000 murders over the last 30 years.
Lancashire police and SOCA say they cannot find them.
They were told by Gennaro Panzuto, the mafia, ‘godfather’ who was seized near Preston, Lancs in 2007 and extradited to Italy.
It was he who revealed that 5 Camorra mobsters were living in Lancashire.
A prosecutor in Naples told the Daily Star; Panzuto was able to give us much information not only on crimes in Italy but also on associates in the UK.
A SOCA insider said; ‘Italian mafia organizations are among the hardest too crack’.
ACCOUNT OF NAZI BRITAIN Part 2
Tuesday, October 12, 1999.
On the above date I appeared on the front page of the North West Evening mail. The headline was NAZI ATTACK ON WAR MEMORIAL. My picture appeared in front of the desecrated war memorial. I warned the people that a paramilitary nazi outfit was targeting Cumbria just as I had seen them target Preston when I lived in Lancashire.
The nazi outfit immediately vanished from my home town of barrow as a result of this front page expose of them. Barrow instantly went back to how I remembered the town thirty years ago. Quiet and pleasant.
August 24, 2000.
Article in the North West Evening Mail. That article was entitled Police Stretched to limit says detective and contained the following: Barrows most senior detective believes figures showing a huge drop in violent crime could just mean fewer incidents being spotted because the town has fewer officers on the streets. A 40% cut in violent offences revealed in new force figures. Figures released showed that between April and July last year there were 621 violent offences. This year only 380 incidents had been reported.
On studying the above I realised the police had compared a two month period of 1999 against an eight period of 2000. The two month period had 621 violent offences whereas the eight month period of the following year had 380 incidents. I also concluded that the term ‘incidents’ did not specifically relate to just violence but was an ‘umbrella’ term.
The police then said that this was a 40% drop in violence in 2000 compared to 1999. When I went to school we were taught that you could not compare like against unlike, a two month period against an eight month period and come up with a 40% figure.
When I returned to Barrow in 1997 people here were terrified of walking out after dark. Lancashire University did a massive study in Barrow and found that 6 out of 10 people were frightened to walk through the town centre after dark, despite there being a military type police surveillance camera on every street corner.
David Blunkett, Home Secretary, came to Barrow to try to find out why Barrow had gone from being one of the most violent towns in the country to one of the safest. He was met by police and town hall Chief Executive, Tom Campbell who told of how their Community Orientated Problem Solvers team (COPS) had sorted the violence problem.
Other terms they use are Intelligence led, pro active, target hardening or neighbour hood police. Blunkett said he would tell the world that this method of policing was the key.
I realised the only way to track things was through hospital records.
North West Evening Mail, April 25, 2005 carried this story: Violent crime injuries down
Researchers at Cardiff University looked at the number of people treated by accident and emergency departments as a result of violent crime between 2000 and 2004.
The study concluded that nearly 25,000 fewer people went to casualty departments in England in 2004 after suffering a violent crime than in 2000.
I realised that what I did in October 1999 had had not only a local impact on violence but that it had impacted nationally as well.
Daily Mail October 23, 2009. The Crimes that no one is counting. Since 2005 the Home Office has made 320 changes to the way violent crime is recorded. Mr O’Connor suggests the picture has become so confused that ministers may need to replace entirely the 150 year old assault laws.
Recently we are told the Home Office changed the way violent crimes were counted in 2002, Changed in a way that made it look as though a lot more violence was happening than actually was.
This is why the British Crime Survey is telling a completely different story of violent crime trends than that of the police stats.
So how much can Labour claim responsibility for?
Very little, according toEnvor Solomon, deputy director of Kings College London’s Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.
He points out that the fall in crime was greatest during Labour’s first term. That’s when spending on crime and policing was at it’s lowest as the government had stuck to the Conservatives spending plan.
However the nazi network was re-established after I drove them out of Cumbria.
North West Evening Mail Dec 13 2001. Headline, Civilians to back police on streets.
A local BNP activist called Bernard Devlin has organised nazi street stalkers working with neighbour hood police teams, he has been backed by Tory councillor Jack Richardson. They target decent individuals and secretly harass them. They are using directed energy weapons on thei.r targets.
I have and am still being targeted by them and their weapons, no one will help me and all I keep hearing from Gordon Brown is that Neighbour Hood policing is the key.
You can see why the former Deputy Mayor of London, Kit Malthouse came under fire for his claims that the Tory’s control the police. He was exactly correct. Cameron has teamed up with the European nazis and plans to abolish police authorities.
Acpo boss: ‘lunatics’ will win with Tory police plan.. 7 September 2009.
Sir Hugh Orde warns that under Camerons proposals to scrap police authorities the nazi nutters will end up running police, well they already are.
The directed energy weapons that the Community Orientated Problem Solvers are using on me have caused severe arthritis in my spine and made all my large back teeth fall out.
The raid on parliament and Damien Green MP was related to this account. Sir Paul Stephenson was in charge of the first wave of this. He was a commander in Lancashire in 1988 in charge of the3500 volunteers set up under Thatcher. That’s where your Community Orientated problem Solvers first started.
They are the Third Position; they are behind the rise of the nazi in Britain.
A recent documentary,When Boris met Dave, gave away that a secret phone call had been sent from the royals to Conservative Central Office. That call instructed the Tories to fast track Cameron to the top of their party as soon as possible. A link Mohamed Alfayed tried to establish in the Diana inquest but failed.
Thatcher set it all up, New Labour have carried it all on and the election victory for Cameron on poling day.
The Fuhrer has arrived.
Peter.
Posted by: Peter Martin | 11/10/2010 at 04:28 PM
Damian Green and the raid on parliament.
If you have read my above abridged account you should then go to: A Crime puzzle: violent crime declines in America, Berkerly blog.
This blog has been posted by Professor Claude Fischer; an American criminologist.
If you study my account and then that of Claude Fischer you will see that the two mirror each other. CIA assasination squads in friendly countries. Cheeney and his boys said it was only thought of since 9/11 but never implemented. Obama has told CIA not to worry he will not expose them; well between the Berkerley blog and my info there it is.
Posted by: Peter Martin | 11/10/2010 at 05:06 PM
At 9 or 10 on the scale, the anger has led to major problems/crime. Maybe they are in prison for some crime committed during an outburst of anger. They may need major deliverance from an obvious demonic problem.
Posted by: cheap supra shoes | 18/04/2011 at 08:54 AM