19/10/2009

Home Office u-turn on DNA retention

Regular readers will be aware that ever since this blog started just over a month ago, we have been campaigning against the retention of the DNA of innocent people on the national DNA database.

DNA_testing First we exposed the fact that the timings the Home Office had used for keeping the DNA of those charged, but not convicted of a crime was based on incomplete research.

Then Alex detailed our government's failure to abide by the European Court of Human Rights ruling preventing the retention of innocent people's DNA.  

Well today we can bring you the news that the Home Office has announced that its plan to keep the DNA profiles of those arrested – but never convicted of a crime – for between six and 12 years depending on the seriousness of the offence has been dropped from the policing and crime bill that is going through parliament.

A Home Office spokesman said:

"We have now completed a public consultation on proposals to ensure the right people are on the database as well as considering when people should come off.

"The Government will take the most expedient route to address the issue as soon as possible in order to comply with the European Court's judgment."

This is great news. The Government had been deliberately foot-dragging on this issue because they didn’t want to accept the consequences of having unanimously lost the European case.

The DNA of innocent people shouldn’t be retained on any database. The Court so ruled: the Government has finally been forced accepted it.

What we need to see now is prompt action to remove innocent people already on the database – many of whom have been waiting and campaigning for this news for years.

By Dylan Sharpe

19 Oct 2009 16:33:52 | DNA database

3 Comments

FaustiesBlog

What's the bet they'll get it anyway - from your own GP. Perhaps next time you have a blood test?

I wouldn't put it past them.

Posted by: FaustiesBlog | 23/10/2009 at 08:51 PM

generic viagra

Well today we can bring you the news that the Home Office has announced that its plan to keep the DNA profiles of those arrested – but never convicted of a crime – for between six and 12 years depending on the seriousness of the offence has been dropped from the policing and crime bill that is going through parliament.

Posted by: generic viagra | 11/03/2010 at 07:14 PM

augmentin 1000 mg

What's the bet they'll get it anyway - from your own GP. Perhaps next time you have a blood test?
http://www.sundrugstore.com/augmentin-c-23_141.html

Posted by: augmentin 1000 mg | 12/10/2010 at 01:42 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEXT POST
CCTV - the placebo effect It's always encouraging to discover that not every politician is blind to the fact that CCTV has problems as well as virtues. As detailed over at the Burton Mail in an admittedly hyperbolic statement reflecting my own experience as a criminal barrister: Labour councillor Gordon Rhind, speaking at a meeting of the council ... said he did not think the technology would secure convictions. He said: “In my experience of CCTV, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) won’t prosecute unless the offender is looking straight into the camera, wearing a T-shirt with their name and address on it. “But I’m all...
PREVIOUS POST
Media Coverage - Tuesday 20th October Metro - Quarter of all workers have criminal records ...But barrister Alex Deane, of privacy pressure group Big Brother Watch, said: 'The benefit to the police of retaining the data is minimal. The cost to the individuals can be huge - and often potentially life-ruining...' Yorkshire Post - Conviction details of 1m to stay on police database Alex Deane, director of Big Brother Watch, which campaigns against intrusions on the privacy and liberties of ordinary Britons, described the court's decision as "crazy". "The benefit to the police of retaining the samples is minimal," he said. "The cost to the individuals,...

Big Brother Watch

Search

Recent Comments